Park / Greenwood Acres

  • 30-July 12
Park_2448 Greenwood Acres

14 Comments

  • Maverix%s's Photo
    Maverix Offline
    Sadly I get a 'file contains invalid data' message when I go to open this.

    I'll save this space for a review when I can open it.
    posted 12 years ago
  • posix%s's Photo
    Germany posix Offline
    Anyone else get this error? Seems to work fine for me.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Pacificoaster%s's Photo
    United States Pacificoaster Offline
    It's working fine for me as well.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Fizzix%s's Photo
    United States Fizzix Offline
    I don't have any problems with it either. I really liked this. It was simple, charming, and well, green. If you open the map, you can see that everything was planned, which I love. The path flows(albeit in uniform length) perfectly around the park. Archy was simple, and sometimes boring, but I still enjoyed it. The layouts were ok, nothing special. The only thing I really didn't like about this was the foliage. It was low in effort and aesthetics. I voted 55%.
    posted 12 years ago
  • disneylhand%s's Photo
    disneylhand Offline
    I very much enjoyed Wild Twister aside from the final helix. I'll echo most of Fizzix's criticisms; especially his notes on the foliage.

    I haven't really kept up with who all is participating in this NCSO trend and I'm guessing people have their own reasons for building this way, but I for one hope it doesn't pick up too much momentum in the future. Most of these structures are incapable of holding my attention. Not sure if it's the builder's doing or just the lack of objects as I haven't tried it myself in ages, but either way it's a choice to work within these constraints.

    -disneylhand
    posted 12 years ago
  • chorkiel%s's Photo
    Netherlands chorkiel Offline
    I agree about the foliage being too simple and the layouts being nothing special.

    I disagree about the architecture. It was mainly boring and it didn't hold my attention really long. It felt uninspired but it did have its purposes which was better.

    The park was really nice planned you could see that he really envisioned his work before building.

    all in all it really didn't do anything for me honestly.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Jonny93%s's Photo
    Germany Jonny93 Offline
    The park was overall okay, but there was nothing special there. Every area felt similar to each other. Especially the architecture was boring, because the most buildings have the same structure and i felt no theming background. Like the other said the foilage wasnt very good.
    All in all i think this park is descent but not accolade worthy.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Camcorder22%s's Photo
    United States Camcorder22 Offline
    I just found this really uninspired and sterile in every aspect, whether it be the building, naming, coasters, etc. I've seen some impressive NCSO before but was not a fan of the architecture here, not just because of the objects. It all was extremely square and just looked rushed. Some of the layouts were ok, though nothing interesting, and while the layout of the park, shape of the lake, contour of the hills were ok, the foliage looked random and not very well thought out. I was just not sensing much significant effort or inspiration here. For your next park, I'd say place the same emphasis on planning out the layout, but try to also place importance on concept, atmosphere, etc. I gave it a 35%.
    posted 12 years ago
  • 5dave%s's Photo
    Austria 5dave Offline
    I definately think it was Bronze-worthy! Well, maybe next time!
    I liked how well-planned, organized, flowing and clean it looked. Maybe it was a bit too woodsy in parts - some clean grass spots with minimal foliage would have been nice too.
    Maybe it wasn't the most original park ever, but I thought it was very well executed to a almost professional level.

    Also the layouts were quite nice. The white woody had a very unusual and majestic look to it. Really liked that.
    Keep it up, maybe next time work on your detailing, theming ideas and foliage and it'll score much better!

    "MFG"
    posted 12 years ago
  • Comment System%s's Photo
    United Kingdom Comment System Offline
    posted 12 years ago
  • Hex%s's Photo
    United States Hex Offline
    I got the error thing as well. I get them a lot anymore... :(
    posted 12 years ago
  • pierrot%s's Photo
    Korea, Republic of pierrot Offline
    yeah it's definitely bronze worthy, every same/boring buildings are here and there but very well planned and enjoyable.

    oh, I'm a huge fan of Wild Twister, easily one of best woody imo. congrats ;)
    posted 12 years ago
  • coldserved%s's Photo
    Philippines coldserved Offline
    Hey man. I would have edited this for you, so please let me.I am a designer that helped lots of people in many games. If you want me to edit, give me the things I need, and I will help you.

    But hey! You got the bronze like! Gratz!
    posted 12 years ago
  • coldserved%s's Photo
    Philippines coldserved Offline
    And oh, I am the very first Filipino in NE designs.
    posted 12 years ago
  • Camcorder22%s's Photo
    United States Camcorder22 Offline
    Posted Image
    posted 12 years ago
  • 45.00%(required: 50%)  Spotlight Submission
    Percentage of vote: 45%
    Fizzix 55%
    pierrot 55%
    5dave 50%
    Coupon 50%
    tyandor 50%
    disneylhand 45%
    geewhzz 45%
    Pacificoaster 45%
    Phatage 45%
    BelgianGuy 40%
    chorkiel 40%
    In:Cities 40%
    Jonny93 40%
    wheres_walto 40%
    Camcorder22 35%
    45.00%
  • No fans of this park
  • Download Park 480
  • Objects 262
  • Tags