Park / Anaconda

7 Comments

• 

  ZeRoSkIlL Offline

  What have I been so secretive about? Why won't I post pics of parks? I've been waiting from a reply from this. What exactly is it? A design. And yes, it failed. Miserably. Yet, I believe this is still something nice to have under my belt.
  
  Without further ado: Anaconda by ZeRoSkIlL!
  
  
  
  The feedback from Cork:
  
  Anyway, no, this won't be a Design. It's a very simplistic work with some nice theming but not really a lot of quality. The roller coaster seems to meander through its layout in a lazy way (that second hill is way too slow) and it's rather short. You say it's a family coaster, but it's laid out like a regular "grown up" one, and either way, it doesn't really act consistent to what it seems to be.
  
  The buildings are pretty plain, though not bad, and the station is minimalistic.
  
  Overall, while this is by no means horrible work, it comes off as pretty forgettable. I think you need to work on incorporating more architecture and theming to make the park more immersible, and theme the coaster a little more. Right now, it's not much more than track going over some nice terrain (nice job on the landscaping, actually).
  
  So sorry about the late late late response, but hopefully the feedback helps. Feel free to release this or send it to another site.
  
  - Cork
  
  I completely understand what he said. I mean, I need to improve on my stations, and the coaster didn't really interact with the buildings that much. All this time, I felt like something was missing, and that was it. Nonetheless, I gave ti my all, and I know that this was good work. It wasn't superior, but it was good. I hope you guys enjoy it.
  
  Anaconda - By ZeRoSkIlL
  
  
  
  P.S. I guess Turtle (I think) is right, it's much harder to impress the critics than the masses.

  posted 18 years ago

  • #1
  • Back to top
• 

  RCFanB&M Offline

  Looks good, although kinda simple.
  The coaster has a nice layout, but it's too short...if I had been you, I'd have done it longer. The architecture looks ok, so does te lascaping and foliage, you made a good job with that.
  Hope you make it, next time.

  posted 18 years ago

  • #2
  • Back to top
• 

  rK_ Offline

  i like the sig better then the coaster.

  posted 18 years ago

  • #3
  • Back to top
• 

  eman Offline

  If you were attempting to build a much less exciting, toned down EGF with a worse atmosphere, you succeeded. The archy was pretty nice aside from the station which I hated. Landscaping was decent too. But the layout of the coaster was quite poor, and the supporting was poorly done as well. Overall a 5/10 I'd say.

  posted 18 years ago

  • #4
  • Back to top
• 

  Rhynos Offline

  Doesn't remind me too much of a sweltering jungle atmosphere. I think you needed bigger trees (made of LIM vert sections, raised bushes, and water slide roots), a thicker underbrush, and a bit more terrain-hugginess from that coaster. That raised rock formation under the second hill just looks out of place to me.

  posted 18 years ago

  • #5
  • Back to top
• 

  JDP Offline

  I honestly didn't like it. There was nothing too amazing to look at and the coaster layout was really bad imo. The first hill killed the whole ride for me. The supports were not good as well. Sorry man, just my two cents.
  -JDP

  posted 18 years ago

  • #6
  • Back to top
• 

  Gwazi Offline

  -----> BANG! ----->
  
  Supports/Park ....................... Park
  (left to right)

  posted 18 years ago

  • #7
  • Back to top
• 

  Ling Offline

  wow. you're submission got an even worse review than mine... Nice job; the landscaping looks okay, but the station and the ride are just "meh"

  posted 18 years ago

  • #8
  • Back to top