(Archive) Place-To-Release-Your-Parks Land / an unfinished old park

rewrite, Lets try again.
in end 2009, begin 2010 i built this huge park. Its notably unfinished. i like to point out that i cares more for rating then designs, which shows. now its pretty much the other way around, i still like good rating tho for peepability. well, there are some undeniably awesome ratings in here, no hacks, 2 pieces cso. of say take a look.

http://kumba.parkmak...shed-park-1.zip

some notes:
-this park is à mess , i know that. you dont have to tell me
-autocorrect on iPod is à pain excuse any mistakes, will fix em later.

Edited by MadraDot, 10 May 2010 - 03:22 PM.

o boi i can smell the bad comments already.

me too... posting something like this without screens is going get a few comments out of some people... and cause most to not download it at all... You also shot down the park before anyone got a chance to take it in... and then there's all the excuses and comments about not caring blah blah blah.

Ya might try a different technique next time to raise peoples interest, no matter how bad you think it is. Everybody comes here to learn. You won't get blasted just because you're new at it... and for the love of all that is holy!!! post screens!

Right, I decided to check this out even though you kinda anti-advertised it...

Ok so obviously you're very good at designing 10+ excitement rated coasters. Some very straight out ridiculous, like artquake and king/queen of darkness. The latter had some really cool interactions with each other, and it was actually kinda beautiful to watch the trains run along the heavily helixed track. That said, the coasters themselves were everthing but aesthethically pleasing. You might have the technical aspect (atleast in terms of how RCT judges it) of layout making down but certainly not the artistic. It is possible to do unrealistic coasters without them looking horrible, take a look at mount doom in the gold section for a couple of good examples on that.

Then the theming. There wasn't much. But, when you put in some effort, the result was pretty cool, like the chocolate cats ride or w/e it's name was. If you change your attitude towards making parks and advertising them here, to a more serious and considerate style (and with some more self-confidence maybe) you can definately become a player to look out for.

Right, I decided to check this out even though you kinda anti-advertised it...

Ok so obviously you're very good at designing 10+ excitement rated coasters. Some very straight out ridiculous, like artquake and king/queen of darkness. The latter had some really cool interactions with each other, and it was actually kinda beautiful to watch the trains run along the heavily helixed track. That said, the coasters themselves were everthing but aesthethically pleasing. You might have the technical aspect (atleast in terms of how RCT judges it) of layout making down but certainly not the artistic. It is possible to do unrealistic coasters without them looking horrible, take a look at mount doom in the gold section for a couple of good examples on that.

Then the theming. There wasn't much. But, when you put in some effort, the result was pretty cool, like the chocolate cats ride or w/e it's name was. If you change your attitude towards making parks and advertising them here, to a more serious and considerate style (and with some more self-confidence maybe) you can definately become a player to look out for.

everything in this mess is ridiculous clearly i just built stuff whereever space was free. one thing i know is i'll never do something like this again, it's way too big to finish and afterwards doesn't look good at all. i don't strive for excitement anymore now and design some better stuff because i know now that all layouts are just um... yeah.

i love mount doom, but at the time i really wasnt into NE yet, i think i had just a few parks from here, that's all. i know i can put more effort into rct now that stuff happened.

oh, and also i don't think you're the first to comment on my self confidence.