Park / Tomahawk

25 Comments

• 

  Airtime Offline

  I absolutely loved this! Thought it was brilliant. Definately thought this deserved higher score than it got but I can understand why. The map was cut-off a hell of a lot for me, and I'm guessing for a lot of others.
  
  The entrnace plaza and architecture was awesome! It had a good atmostphere around the entrance to the ride as well. Such a great area. The layout was good and station was awesome as well.
  
  The landscape colours and foliage surrounding the turnaround wasn't that good. There was a little too much of the sand texture or whatever it is around there and the tree selection in the foliage could have been better I'm afraid.
  
  Love your work so can't wait to see more!

  posted 13 years ago

  • #21
  • Back to top
• 

  Xeccah Fan Offline

  One of the most underrated designs ever, in my opinion. Funny to see people vote low on stuff whenever the expectation for a design is now a whole part of a park.

  posted 9 years ago

  • #22
  • Back to top
• 

  RCT2day Offline

  I'd say the vote % is fair.  The layout is beautiful - one of the best I've ever seen I'd say.  But the surrounding area is mediocre.  He could have added even a small supporting ride or another building or even more foliage around the coaster.

  posted 9 years ago

  • #23
  • Back to top
• 

  Xeccah Fan Offline

  But that's the thing- a design is meant to be a coaster and just a little context around it. Coaster+station+queue+path interactions+building=design.

  posted 9 years ago

  • #24
  • Back to top
• 

  inthemanual Offline

  Where's the context? Obviously a strong coaster, but there isn't context. You don't get a sense for what this belongs to, where it fits in to a park, or anything like that.

  posted 9 years ago

  • #25
  • Back to top
• 

  Louis! Offline

  I agree with Shogo. A design shouldn't always have to be a section of a whole park, they were originally meant to be layout showcases.

  posted 9 years ago

  • #26
  • Back to top