(Archive) Advertising District / BM

^X-2-ArchAngel?

It was good. Good layout, good theming, good supports and realism, very very good. How about chawton woods now shall we?

RMM: WTF! you are such a hypocritcal shite you really are.

''Im RMM or RCTMadman. The one who never finished anything.'' - taken from your park thread.

I don't understand why you are being so harsh to me. You come out of no where and just start giving me crap, then say that i suck becuase i release an unfinished design becuase i have more important things to do in my life then tease your little prick?

seriously get a life, get laid, get a Llama, get somehing that will stop you from being such mantis cus you're probably a nice person, really. And it isn't just this thread that you are being disrespectful.


+cough+ anywho

thanks for the comments about the Swat, however i still feel tehre is more to be done to it so don't say that it is wasted cus it will be back and better. As for the supports - until someone makes the right sized supports then i will keep using the small ones. I feel the thicker ones (such as phatage's) are good but i don't think fit in well with the ride.

And.... then I came back. I finished 3 huge projects already. 3 designs... wait for the other one.

Lol... calm down man. I was kidding when I said you suck. For real tho I was. I was gonan put that face but I wanted to see how you'd react. Haha its cool man. I understand.

And get a life??? Haha I hate how people say that. I have been at school and basketball conditionin and workin out and all for school. I have a life. I have friends. I have a life man. C'mon think bout that man. How was I bein disrespectful in other topics. I was just statin whats real, lil ass screens dont show nuthin. If thats the topic u talkin bout.

Its cool man. Just calm down.

-RMM-

If you're going off an artist's conceptual artwork for a coaster, you have to look at it with a grain of salt. Usually these coaster illustrations are created on the whim of an artist who has seen engeneering plans or othe artist's drawings of the attraction. I would take the major elements to heart, but I have noticed in the past that these renderings fall short of what actually, eventually, exist.

So I don't blame you one iota for putting the project on hold, as chances are, it won't be what you think these released illustrations have lead you to believe. I mean, I saved such illustrations from Kumba's (Busch Gardens, Tampa,) announcement, and the artist had streached the train off to the horizon, thinking it must have 40 cars or something. They also manipulated the visuals to make you think that a set of curves were at 90 deg. angles to the ground. Not!

Montu's advertizing not only had extended trains, but the depicted layout isn't what it ended up with. They had pyramids & the Sphinx, and set the hype to "max" which never came to be. So don't feel jerked if these images turn out to be on the "semi-valid" side of things.

As far as blocking out areas of illustrations, it just keeps members from commenting on stuff you might not care to address, like "There's no trees over there." or "What about that big blank area?" when it's never going to be developed anyway. This was one attraction, and it was never intended to be the entire park. It's incomplete, (it's based on incomplete or erronious illustrations) and it'll get updated later.

Read the entire thread and this info may somehow become lodged, if they happen to have any gray matter between their ears. It was never intended to be perfect.