General Chat / The Offical Photography Thread

How does one burn a digital photo?

Photoshop, there is a burn tool which is quite like an airbrush.
I shouldn't be posting this, but here is the original:

That one with the wool has something blotting the top part of the picture. It would look better without it IMO.
I think the unedited one of those lemon photos is better.

That one with the wool has something blotting the top part of the picture. It would look better without it IMO.
I think the unedited one of those lemon photos is better.

One the wool one that was an elbow, I couldn't justify editing it out. Infact I even highlighted that part.

I always try to push my photos too far. Just looking at the original non-edited one is sometimes boring to me. I don't know, really.
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.c...></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.c.../v/Fz0hoNdyE1s" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Bruckner, knowing nothing about photography, it seems to me like you're posting these more for the attention than to showcase your work. Don't sell out, man. There's a huge difference between using you talents to support yourself and pandering to your audience.

Black Actors, yo.

I see what you are saying but I liked to have my photography discussed. I post what I think is different and I want some opinions on it so I can mold my photography.

I promise you, I will be the last person to sell out.

heavily edited.

You really seem to enjoy the strong contrast aesthetic.

You really seem to enjoy the strong contrast aesthetic.

Low contrast photography is extremely difficult with digital.

more material for gity-poo-woo-woo:












git will like the very last one.

i like that third one.

The 3rd and 4th pictures look like you screwed up.

The 3rd and 4th pictures look like you screwed up.

eh, okay!

more material for gity-poo-woo-woo:
git will like the very last one.

I dunno. Almost all of your pictures are are extreme close-ups. It becomes difficult to care after a while.
The colours are neat, but I think that's more of a Photoshop thing.

Photographers:
Don't use Photoshop. It is the photography equivelent of, fucking, Pro Tools.

eh, okay!

You know what? You're right. Pictures blurred beyond recognition are really cool.

I'm going to take some blurry pictures of railroad tracks, brb.

Same thing as a darkroom, but I wouldn't expect you to know that git.

Same thing as a darkroom, but I wouldn't expect you to know that git.

Condescending little shit, aren't you?
And no, it's not the same thing as a darkroom, really. A darkroom would be the equivelent of old fashioned tape-editing.

But I wouldn't expect you to know that, fuckass.

Edit: Just so there's no confusion as to my point here:
EVERYTHING DIGITAL IS GAY. ELECTRICTY SHOULD BE BANNED.

Edited by catachresistant, 30 April 2006 - 03:33 PM.

Condescending little shit, aren't you?
And no, it's not the same thing as a darkroom, really. A darkroom would be the equivelent of old fashioned tape-editing.

But I wouldn't expect you to know that, fuckass.

Edit: Just so there's no confusion as to my point here:
EVERYTHING DIGITAL IS GAY. ELECTRICTY SHOULD BE BANNED.

hey, that reminds me when chauncey was ranting about digital music and how bad it is. you know, concerts are the only real music and anything on electronics or a cd is the fucking diabolic st. mary come back to rape your neice.

that was novel.

Same thing as a darkroom, but I wouldn't expect you to know that git.

Yes, and a laptop is the same as a recording studio.

Yes, and a laptop is the same as a recording studio.

Obviously all of you are dense, what I meant is that everything you can do in Photoshop you can do in a darkroom or a day lab.

Obviously all of you are dense, what I meant is that everything you can do in Photoshop you can do in a darkroom or a day lab.

And everything you can do on a laptop you can do in a recording studio, so don't call me dense.