Micro Madness / One more round?

But yeah, four in one round or two in two rounds doesnt really matter to me. Except that it kind of kills the bracket thing thats been going the whole time.

The brackets are killed in a "4 for all" thats why I prefer my idea.

consolation round? meh, fuck that... I'm out

and lol @ Xin...

You realise that if you use the same parks twice, the parks won't change right? So the final will be the most uninteresting round of the entire contest. With a four-way, user-voted match-up it will probably be the most interesting round.

The bracket theory: it revolves around there being different parks each round. With a four-way, it's still a bracket. It just leads to a different final setting within the bracket.

You realise that if you use the same parks twice, the parks won't change right? So the final will be the most uninteresting round of the entire contest. With a four-way, user-voted match-up it will probably be the most interesting round.

I completely agree. Don't kill what has been a great competition with a shitty final round. This thing has been a breath of fresh air, a final 4, one round only would be much more interesting.

Ryan and Jon can we please get your thoughts on this?

I think a good option would be to have the judges select the top 2 first. Then third/fourth place will be voted on by the members from the bottom 2 entries, and first/second place will be voted on from the top 2 entries.

I think a good option would be to have the judges select the top 2 first. Then third/fourth place will be voted on by the members from the bottom 2 entries, and first/second place will be voted on from the top 2 entries.

Nice idea I'll go for that.

Tell you what Xin, you did beat RRP, a #1 seed, so just send something in for the championships and I will see to it that I don't ignore the submission and rightfully put you in with the Final 4 [/sarcasm

The way you made it sound, I thought everyone was going to make one last entry, and then a public vote would decide the best four, and then one more public vote would decide the winner. My mistake, I suppose...

And don't think I didn't catch your sarcasm tag. If you want to get technical, it's invalid since you only used one, and you failed to properly syntax it. (Although the proposition does sound nice... You'd have to make me a parkmaker though, since I made it to the Final Four/Five. )

^Yeh but he wouldn't, because you would have made it to the final 5 not final 4. So :blows raspberry:

a real 4 match is fine for me to .... actually I tought you ment that first and after re-reading your post I understood what you really wanted .

Sorry, I've been out of town. Anyways, it sounds good with me. I agree with WME too; a 4 way round would probably be more interesting (though it doesn't really affect me, so I don't mind either way). And I can especially use the extra time, since I have a lot of other fun stuff going on up until early March.