Edited by Silenced, 22 April 2007 - 08:59 PM.
Not to be offensive but I really think there should be atleast a second or third party having SOME say on judging these.
NE Design, Runner-Up, Super Runner-Up and Spotlight exemption If you win one of these and are a Non-NE Parkmaker during the course of the prelims you will receive an invite into the finals vs. the NE Parkmakers and Prelim winners.
I agree 100% with Six Frags on the RU and Design thing. Especially the designs, coz that pretty much eliminates the need for prelims, considering most prelims are just designs anyway.And I'm not sure, but was there more prelims in previous PT's, coz there seems like very few at the moment.
^Then the contest should be renamed as 'NE Tour' Seriously, what's the point of having prelims if you can get in with a design?If Kumba allows that, the required quality of designs should be upped MAJORLY.. Like Arch Angel quality.. Same as for RU, although that maybe less than designs, as it usually has more content in it, and thus requires more of the parkmaker..SF
What's the problem with the current Design requirements? Are you implying that some of the recent Design winners wouldn't be good enough for PT3?
Edited by CoasterAnne, 23 April 2007 - 07:32 AM.
Community Forum Software by IP.Board