Park / Islands of Adventure Hollywood

Park_38 Islands of Adventure Hollywood

65 Comments

  • mantis%s's Photo

    Damn! How did I forget that one? Yes, Dragon Flight is an amazing ride, the rest aren't.

    At least you can find one thing you like.

    Dragon Flight is probably my favourite floorless coaster - the diagonal lift, the first drop and the interlocking vertical loops divided by the corkscrew make it different and exciting. I don't really need to say anything about the theming (I think all of JS's theming is great).

    I liked the JP area quite a lot (nice to see a bare patch instead of damn cactuses everywhere), and the supports on the water ride were fine.
  • Coaster Ed%s's Photo
    I guess I continue to see things differently than most. I really enjoyed this park. It's one of my favorite NE spotlights and one of the first IOA parks that really feels like IOA.

    First of all, the entry area is good parkmaking indeed but it's boring as hell. That's how I felt about Moonlight Magic as well. A lot of it looks good but too much of it looks forgotten and except for the Quake coaster nothing jumps out as especially original or interesting. A good park but forgettable. I won't even mention Canterbury Falls. I looked at it once, that was enough.

    But anyway now that you know what I think of what came before, I'll tell you why this is so much more impressive. Let's start with...

    The Jurassic Park section. You all are crazy. This is the best section in the park. The flying coaster is excellent, it has interesting elements but more importantly a great flow from beginning to end. The two bare mountains look great. A bunch of bushes would have spoiled the look I think. Who made the rule that Jurassic Park sections have to be filled with jungle trees and dinosaurs? In fact, this section really reminded me of Evolutia in a way no other park has. So I congratulate Schuessler for this one. This is what Jurassic Park looks like to me. This is sorta hypocritical of me to say, but I think sometimes all those little details just get distracting. Elegant simplicity should be praised I say.

    As for Merlinwood, it wasn't much of a section really. The medieval buildings are still boring. If I took pictures of medieval buildings in 80% of the parks on this site and shuffled them together who could tell the difference? Dragon Flight however is one exceptional coaster and probably the highlight of the park. The layout didn't strike me as particularly good but this is another ride that flows naturally. This is great coaster design. The medieval walls add a lot to the look of the coaster. Oh yeah, and bonus points for a great queue as well. So lame section, awesome coaster.

    Marvel Super Hero Island was pretty daring. First of all he only used the new Marvel movies X-Men, Spider-Man, Hulk, and Daredevil which I thought was a nice touch. This section is just so different than anything I've seen before that I can't help but like it. It isn't beautiful and it does look too grey but it has a nice city feel to it. And the Spider-Man coaster is as well designed as Dragon Flight just a lot shorter and with a powered launch that feels like a cop out for a real coaster design. However, it does fit the section and it's also something new. Do we really need a lift hill? Are they really that exciting anyway? Another impressive section.

    Hamunaptra is pretty neat looking. There is a good counterpoint between the trees and the tan surfaces. However, this isn't really something we haven't seen before. I'm glad the flowers aren't all over the place like in other Schuessler parks. This is a good amount of flowers for a section. The architecture in this section is pretty good stuff and I like that big old ride building. Flat planes work well in RCT if you use them right and this works for me. The actual Mummy ride is kinda boring as are most indoor coasters. And I must say I don't understand the logic of throwing all those pine trees in there. In any case this is a pretty ordinary section for a park like this but still nice looking and very IOA nonetheless.

    The arabian section is also too small for it's own good. It does fit the park though and it doesn't need a major ride or anything. There's some nice detail in the theater building and I love that little fort section with Chimera Glass and the Coin Mint.

    Lastly, the Lost Continent section has some neat touches like the Mythos building but is also fairly routine. The river ride has a nice design and some great building design. It does feel like it needs more so this is probably my least favorite section.

    So some stuff I really like, some stuff I don't like as much but all of it is good. More than worthy of the NE spot I think and none of your uncultured ramblings will alter my opinion any. Schuessler has redeemed himself in my eyes.
  • Micool%s's Photo

    Harakiri's is ofcourse right to say that the real Egypt wasn't that detailed, but to quote CG: This is rct.

    Same with the Jurassic Area, Coaster Ed.
  • PyroPenguin%s's Photo
    Before I start I would like to mention that I rather dislike realism in RCT parks because what looks perfectly fine while walking through a park often looks simply ugly when viewing it in rct, but thats just my feelings on the matter. On to the park.

    Enterance: Overall the enterance was nice, but a few of the buildings looked plain and in the end it came out as notihng special.

    Marvel: Looking at the mini map pic tells the whole story, the whoel tihng is grey... and thats bad. While it may be a harder theme to do, it came out quite boring. I really think the use of a bunch more glass and color would have boosted this area's interest up.

    Hamanaptra: Great landscaping and rides, boring buildings. Once again... even if Egyptian buildings werent the most interestign things to look at they looked better than this, and you do have some creative room to work with it. I would expect more than several giant square buildings, the one housing the coaster being the biggest problem.

    JP: As stated earlier, it doesnt matter if real mountains are bare... in RCT bare mountians are jsut ugly and boring. The flyer isnt much to look at and the architecture is rather non existant except for a few very small scattered structures.

    Merlinwood: A truly awesome area. For the most part a great variety of intricate architecture, but not without a few buildings lacking behind. Dragon FLight is an amazing beemer and probably my favorite. Great theming and atmosphere overall for this area.

    Lost Continent: Wow that building housing Poseidon's Fury is ugly... way too bulky and absolutly notihng going on with it. The rest of the area is fine, but bears a strong resemblance of the egyptian section.

    In the end I was rather disappointed as there was little that was likable to be found.
  • Elrocko%s's Photo
    Bah, I'm back. Woo... Anyways, I definatly wasn't dissapointed with IOAH mainly because I wasn't expecting too much from it in the first place. I dunno if it's just me, but I looked at I MM recently, and it isn't really amazing anymore. JS's style is very bland, and there was too much nothing, like the rocks, mountains, sand, bleh I dunno. I overall just wasn't really shocked from the park, but I wasn't that dissapointed. I didn't get to look at the coasters, but I'm sure they're great. I hope to see more parks from JS, but your style needs to advance. :|
  • Coaster Ed%s's Photo
    Well in light of PyroPenguin's comments I feel I should clarify my personal vision of what makes a good RCT park. I totally agree with everything you said Pyro since you established your stance on realism in RCT. It's only fair that I do the same.

    My favorite parks from Danimation and the early years of RCT were all recreations. The fantasy parks all contained huge coasters with two dozen helixes and 12 inversions etc. which I always found ridiculous. The recreations however had shorter rides with more interesting layouts. Recreations were also the first to implement double wide paths and buildings out of terrain because you can't go far in recreations without those. Later some builders started building fantasy parks with the same principles as a recreation. mrIce in particular was a big proponent of this but there were also others. CPRulz and Segaman75 made some great stuff and Aero21 made a lot of realistic parks with some elements of fantasy. I'm forgetting some others of course but you get the idea. So I've always loved realism in RCT parks which unfortunately wasn't the mainstream until NE really.

    Strictly realistic parks limit themselves only to coaster layouts which are found in real coasters and coaster types that are actually built. They also tend to favor modest architecture which is much more typical in real amusement parks than the fantastic designs you see in some RCT fantasy stuff. Others take some of the realistic ideas but spice them up with huge rides, elaborate themes, and larger than life architecture. Both styles work well but some tend to prefer more or less of each.

    So when I say I love this park understand that this is coming from someone with a stronger leaning toward realism in RCT. All manner of opinions are equally justified by situating people along this scale of pure fantasy to pure reality. Leaving hills blank doesn't make sense when thinking in terms of RCT and creating impressive fantasy but it does make sense if you want to capture the look and feel of a real life location.
  • GigaForce%s's Photo
    I think OBX by Butterfinger shouldve won this spotlight...i saw some screens that looked RATHER GOOD...you will see when released
  • Butterfinger%s's Photo
    I liked this park. I didnt LOVE it, but I liked it. It definetly portrayed IOA, and was very realistic as well. Although it isnt going to make any top 10 list of mine, it was a nice park and probably deserved spotlight..... that is, right after MY PARK!!! WHATS UP WITH YOU IRIS?!?! HOW DARE YOU NOT PICK MY PARK?!?! lol j/k


    And now with his view heard, the Persnickety Platypus goes off to dwindle in his mysterious ways...
  • mantis%s's Photo

    I liked this park. I didnt LOVE it, but I liked it. It definetly portrayed IOA, and was very realistic as well. Although it isnt going to make any top 10 list of mine, it was a nice park and probably deserved spotlight..... that is, right after MY PARK!!! WHATS UP WITH YOU IRIS?!?! HOW DARE YOU NOT PICK MY PARK?!?! lol j/k


        And now with his view heard, the Persnickety Platypus goes off to dwindle in his mysterious ways...

    Just thought I'd take this opportunity to say you rock.
  • Testudo%s's Photo
    Fantastic park! Nice layout, great themeing, nice architecture, first rate coasters/rides, and an overall nice feel.

    A solid 8 out 10 rating!

    BTW, all of the Spotlight parks on this site are wonderful!
  • Stargazer%s's Photo

    BTW, all of the Spotlight parks on this site are wonderful


    Welcome to NE, Testudo, maybe you could share you FDS with the people who havent seen it.

    *Stargazer* :t2:
  • GigaForce%s's Photo
    Finally another new member that makes sense ;)

    Anywayz welcome to NE...wat is this FDS i hear about besides the spotlight one
  • mantis%s's Photo

    Anywayz welcome to NE...wat is this FDS i hear about besides the spotlight one

    Testudo's Florida Disney Sea is one of my cherished parks - the main hotel complex is astounding and the journey to atlantis is the best i've seen in any Disney Sea park. Personally, I think this park kicks CDS's ass, but doesn't quite match vTd's FDS.
  • x-sector%s's Photo

    Anywayz welcome to NE...wat is this FDS i hear about besides the spotlight one

    Testudo's Florida Disney Sea is one of my cherished parks - the main hotel complex is astounding and the journey to atlantis is the best i've seen in any Disney Sea park. Personally, I think this park kicks CDS's ass, but doesn't quite match vTd's FDS.

    Thats because CDS was a crap park mantis
  • GigaForce%s's Photo
    Woah! ive heard people flame this park, but never the maker of it. Yikes...i dont even think ive ever heard anyone flame their own park cept if it was a n00b park...not a spotlight...oh well he is right CDS wasnt too good
  • x-sector%s's Photo
    Gigaforce I slate all my parks theres only one that I like and its Disnmey Extreme
  • iris%s's Photo

    Woah! ive heard people flame this park, but never the maker of it. Yikes...i dont even think ive ever heard anyone flame their own park cept if it was a n00b park...not a spotlight...oh well he is right CDS wasnt too good

    You say that like you could do better..
  • GigaForce%s's Photo
    Not now i couldnt...maybe with experience...no lol
  • Butterfinger%s's Photo

    Anywayz welcome to NE...wat is this FDS i hear about besides the spotlight one

    Testudo's Florida Disney Sea is one of my cherished parks - the main hotel complex is astounding and the journey to atlantis is the best i've seen in any Disney Sea park. Personally, I think this park kicks CDS's ass, but doesn't quite match vTd's FDS.

    Thats because CDS was a crap park mantis

    Uhhh... I really liked CDS. Much better than any of your other work IMO. All your other parks just wernt my style at all. Vermonty Resort is the most overrated park on earth besides Legends and Legends West, no offence.


    Anyways, thats just one platypusses' opinion... :bandit:
  • x-sector%s's Photo
    well thanks butterfinger I glad you liked it. I agree about Vermonty Resort It was a bit overratted anyway lets not talk about my rubbish parks and use this fourm to talk about JS wonderful park