Screenshot / Batman : Fight for Justice
-
30-September 17
- Views 3,210
- Fans 3
- Comments 31
nedesigns
- Copyright © 2002-2024 New Element Designs
-
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
The news don't give you the right to attack votes.
If he thinks it deserves 30%, he's allowed to rate it as such. He explained what he didn't like about it as well.
Clarification edit: In no way do I think this deserves 30% and Julow is more than welcome to question why he did; but in general I think just because one person rated a screenshot 75% doesn't mean others need (or should, for that matter) to think "oh, this is at 75% so I'll vote "x""
I'm gonna have to call bullshit on that. How do you know he changed his vote? For all you know, someone else could've voted low.
Giving this 30% is more accurate than giving basically every park 75% and saying, it should win Gold.
In what world was that an attack? He is questioning someone's vote and that's everyone's right. I think Julow's question was very understandable and even justified. I have trouble understanding how this can be perceived as 30% work, even if you think there are too many track types.
As it is your right to voice your shitty opinion on other people's opinions. And your voting practices that are worse than Julow's "everything is gold".
There was three votes, first one at 75% by unknown, 30% by him and then another one of 60-65% by another player. Then I looked again and the rating dropped severely again with still 3 votes. It's either one of the two 60-75% voters changed his mind and drasticaly lowered his vote, knowing that in the first place their votes were positive, it would be weird having such a change. Or it's a mysterious 30% voter.
Honestly something like 50% would be more understandable for me, because even if you don't like it, there's planning, a concept, some research and creativity. 30% is what you give to novice players that misses all the above.
I know I made some mistakes in the past, I didn't fully understand the "rating system" but now I think I'm starting to learn how it works slowly but surely.
Edit: sorry for all the drama
I gave it 40%, so I don't think 30% is unreasonable at all...
That's not unreasonable from your vote. It is quite unreasonable for a screen that's getting easy 65-75 votes. Your vote isn't the only one that counts.
The woodie track is fine, it's the virginia reel which really clashes in my opinion.
This is pretty nice in my opinion. Though, I do agree with the general consensus here. Maybe a touch dark, perhaps? Though, I would guess with Gotham, if I know anything about it, would be rather dark.
I like this; this is promising to me.
Problem is, that art is subjective, so nobody can really say if the 30-40 votes are unreasonable or the 65-75 votes.